As CryptCraze reported earlier today, crypto lending platform BlockFi will pay $100 million in fines per an agreement realized with the U.S. Securities and Exprogress Commission (SEC). According to the regulator, BlockFi was offering financial products that have been classified as unregistered securities.

Related Reading | Why SEC’s Gensler Views on Crypto Are More Than ‘Disappointing’

U.S. SEC Commissioner Hester “Crypto Mom” Peirce published her views on the BlockFi agreement with the regulator. Peirce asked the question of whether the regulator is taking the “best” approach to protecting consumers, and rapidly replying: “I do think it is, so I respectfully dissent”.

The Commissioner is well-known for trying to propose a regulatory path which enables crypto companies and investors to opecost in the U.S. and expand current laws to fit and better regulate this industry. In that sense, she called the $100 million in penalties to be paid by the lending company “disproportionate”.

Peirce added that the fines will be divided into $50 million to the U.S. SEC, and $50 million “in connection with state settlements for the same conducts”. The Commissioner believes that these fines are frequently imposed to deterred companies from committing bad conduct, but that there is no fact that claims the company failed to fulfill its obligations with its clients.

As part of the agreement, BlockFi filed an S-1 Form. Once it becomes effective, the company will need to become more transparent under the SEC’s regulatory framework, but Peirce claimed the following:

it is above again worth asking whether a framework other than the securities regulatory framework maybe be better suited to getting customers transparency around the terms and risks of crypto lending products. Applying the securities regulatory framework has consequences, some of that may be unfortunate.

A Good Precedent For Crypto, Why The Case Matters For The Entire Industry

Amongst the unfortunate consequences, Crypto Mom believes the U.S. retail investor perhaps be unable to access lending products based on digital assets. BlockFi itself will be unable to take on new clients until its S-1 form becomes effective, a process which could advance for months or beyond.

In addition, BlockFi and any other lending program looking to provide services in the U.S. will need to complete other requirements before relaunching their lending programs. BlockFi could successfully fulfill the requirements, Peirce mentioned which crypto companies could find obstacles as the sector is heavily put under scrutiny, smaller operations maybe fail. The Commissioner added:

We often tell companies wanting to offer products which could implicate the securities laws to “come in and talk to us.”  To make which invitation meaningful, however, we need to commit to working with these companies to craft sensible, timely, and achievable regulatory paths.

On the other hand, Jake Chervinsky, Head of Policy at the Blockchain Association, believes BlockFi realized a “good” deal with the U.S. SEC. Via Twitter, the expert claimed the lending company realized an agreement with could set a precedent and provide regulatory clarity for the crypto industry, and allow comparable companies to opecost in compliance with U.S. law.

Related Reading | David v. Goliath, How Ripple Is Winning The Case Against The SEC

Emphasizing the relevance of today’s event, Chervinsky said:

Look, you can hate the SEC all you want & think the federal securities laws as a whole shouldn’t exist, but the reality is, if you want to be a centralized financial institution offering centralized products to US retail customers, you’ll have to deal with regulation, full stop.